A particular trial, special mobilization! This afternoon at 14:00 8 people who attended the event held in Charleville-Mezieres on October 28 against the 'reform' pensions were to appear before the criminal court of the county town for breaking the window of the permanence of the UMP. The fact offending, reprehensible in itself, provided of course it is proved, had resulted in the middle of December to handed arrest early morning suspects at their homes before the rest of their family and flabbergasted at their place of work, by a platoon of police acting as in a case of highway robbery . This usage clearly intentionally disproportionate force, almost two months after the damage committed, had shocked the unions of course, but also the left parties and a large number of Ardennes (es) who saw a move to discourage future attempts of resistance to anti-social offensive of the government. He had therefore led, first unions to launch a call for a rally quiet and dignified at the time of the trial court, and secondly to creation of a committee of support and solidarity with the demonstrators defendants who had called him at a noisy rally the same place and same time!
A triple suspense was therefore held today : how could there people on the forecourt of the court? Which noisy rally or vigil would win? Above all, what penalty would be imposed to 8 people judged? On the first question, the answer is about 200 , which is more than respectable given that the gathering took place during the working week when no strike notice had been filed, which precluded the presence many employees. Despite the anger easily discernible who came to support remained perfectly calm totally respectful of the great windows of the court who have been subjected to any insult, and no speaking has occurred: the union instructions have been strictly enforced, including by members of the committee support. But most important is that the hearing lasted in all and all for only 15 short minutes , time for the judge in charge of an officer, despite personal reservations - that the MRC considers totally displaced 08 - it held to share, say the postponement of the trial to February 24 at 14:00 . The reason for this decision? The absence for professional reasons duly attested by 2 of defense lawyers, which left him no choice, whatever the vengeful behind these outrageous lawsuits ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment